*Prof Withycombe has given permission to post late due to medical issues.
Collegiate athletics provide
for some of the most entertaining array of sports. Both men’s basketball and
football are widely watched and appreciated throughout the United States of
America. The Typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per
week to his sport, which equates to three more hours than a typical American
works in a given week. With this much time being spent on a given athletic
activity, this leaves little time for student athletes to maintain a job, on
top of a heavy school load they must complete (and do well in) to compete in
athletic events for their school. While, this year, The University of Alabama
reported 143.3 Million in athletics revenues—(more than all 30 NHL teams and 25
of the 30 NBA teams), their players struggle to put groceries in their shelves.
Last year the average salary for a BCS eligible football coach was 2.05 million
dollars. Given that we have millions to spend on coaches, I do not think that
giving players a small stipend of money would not be taking away from the
integrity of collegiate athletics, rather it would improve it. Players would be
able to focus on their schoolwork and athletics, since that is what they came
to school for in the first place, correct? I think a small stipend of money for
collegiate athletes would improve overall flow of the NCAA.
That being said, I personally believe the intention of the NCAA is
not being fulfilled. The student-athletes are being failed by the collegiate
sport system. The NCAA is no longer about providing quality education to those
that are athletically gifted, but has quickly transformed into labor
exploitation of young college athletes. Student-athletes simply do not have
enough hours in a week to support themselves financially, excel in academics,
and perform at practice and on game day. As the NCAA grows, money is increasing
exponentially for everyone involved except
the players. The staff, the director, the University, etc. are receiving an enormous
amount of money each year that only grows larger, while the players continue to
be exploited and manipulated. Mark Emmert, the President of the NCAA stated it
quite clearly. “It has far less to do with the players in the jerseys than the
jerseys themselves”. The NCAA is now more about the Universities success than
the student’s success.
Recently, after winning the National Championship, point guard for the University of Connecticut Shabazz Napier is quoted to have said "It is hard to watch your jersey's being sold when you're going hungry [yourself]".
No comments:
Post a Comment